After sending an e_mail with the European Commission Environment this item:
"COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BREACH OF COMMUNITY LAW .
After writing a letter - always to the European Commission that had this item:
complaint with the Commission of European Communities concerning infringements of Community law. Against Civil Aviation Authority - Civil Aviation Authority for investigation direct violations of the SEA and EIA in relation to the 3rd Runway Airport Malpensa, as assumed in the "Planning Agreement".
Today I sent a letter that has this item:
INTEGRATION complaint to the Commission of European Communities related failures Community law. Against Civil Aviation Authority - Civil Aviation Authority for investigation direct violations of the SEA and EIA - Measures to upgrade the infrastructure of the Airport Flight: "Antonio Canova" Treviso .
.
"COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BREACH OF COMMUNITY LAW .
After writing a letter - always to the European Commission that had this item:
complaint with the Commission of European Communities concerning infringements of Community law. Against Civil Aviation Authority - Civil Aviation Authority for investigation direct violations of the SEA and EIA in relation to the 3rd Runway Airport Malpensa, as assumed in the "Planning Agreement".
Today I sent a letter that has this item:
INTEGRATION complaint to the Commission of European Communities related failures Community law. Against Civil Aviation Authority - Civil Aviation Authority for investigation direct violations of the SEA and EIA - Measures to upgrade the infrastructure of the Airport Flight: "Antonio Canova" Treviso .
.
. Letter, the latter, then that ends well:
1 Valerio Catullo Airport of Verona - experiment only the scoping process - still no way
Airport Civil Aviation Authority in two documents sent Catullo Airport (but also also sent to the European Commission) writes: "It 's clear that during the course of proceedings in the above company Valerio Catullo Airport will not lead to interventions that have lead to increases in capacitance of the traffic. "
no way in the last six months the airport of Verona flights and routes has increased by 30% and is doing work to strengthen the runway to increase the flying range of aircraft and intercontinental routes with the Environmental Impact Study is not yet been sent to the Ministry of the Environment to initiate the EIA process
2_ Milan Malpensa Airport - Decree of Environmental Compatibility NEGATIVE - still no way
Airport Civil Aviation Authority - as indicated in the documents already submitted to the European Commission - is approving the Pro-gram contract between SEA SpA and ENAC which stipulates the construction of a third runway at Malpensa, as well as a number of other enhancements flight infrastructure, but the advance there is no trace. Posts to Malpensa Airport
infrastructure that not only allow an increase in airport charges, which are the work - to alert the Civil Aviation Authority - SEA - should be ready for EXPO 2015 to be held in just four years.
3_ Antonio Canova Airport of Treviso - Decree of Environmental Compatibility NEGATIVE - No Way
Airport Treviso Airport despite the negative opinion of The Regional Natural Park del Fiume Sile è passato da 200.000 a 2.000.000 di passeggeri nonostante avesse ottenuto un Decreto di Compatibilità Ambientale NEGATIVO.
In questi ultimi 10/12 anni, un aeroporto che è stato realizzato all’interno di un’area S.I.C. e quindi all’interno di un Sito di Interesse Comunitario, non ha mai ottenuto un parere positivo di Compatibilità Ambientale e oggi, vi è in atto un tentativo di violazione della Direttiva V.I.A. autorizzando altri lavori e altri potenziamenti.
Il ruolo di controllo e di responsabilità di E.N.A.C. sulla mancanza di V.I.A. degli Aeroporti.
Perché E.N.A.C. che sarebbe un Ente Pubblico che dovrebbe controllare gli aeroporti, perchè prima di approvare degli incrementi Capacitive traffic (eg the airport of Verona), does not verify if these airport facilities are in possession of appropriate decree of Environmental Compatibility? ENAC
Why would a public body should oversee the airports, because before approving the program contracts with the airport management company (for example, Malpensa Airport), airport infrastructure does not verify whether these are in possession of adequate Decree of Environmental Compatibility? ENAC
Why would a public body should oversee the airports, because before approving the expansion and upgrading of airport systems, (eg the airport Treviso) airport infrastructure does not verify whether these are in possession of appropriate decree of Environmental Compatibility? How can
ENAC - but also the city of Treviso - have allowed the Treviso airport could expand and strengthen within a SIC which is the Regional Natural Park of the Sile River? And how can
ENAC shall assume that the third runway at Malpensa has to be designed to be implemented within the Natural Park of the Ticino River? How can
ENAC can afford to upgrade and expand the airport of Verona, with 100% of the scheduled departure of the city of Verona and an area already heavily polluted highways, ring roads and Dial Europe? If
ENAC - National Civil Aviation Authority is the subject controller which should control the airport management company, because then ENAC also becomes the proponent that has different procedures for EIA (Screening - scoping - SIA - VIA), thus becoming at once: Controller well controlled? Why
ENAC BEFORE approving the projects of development of infrastructure of the airport of Treviso (those that are already in the tendering procedure without an EIA) and then asks the screening procedure? ENAC
Why is so convinced to obtain a positive opinion to the exclusion of the EIA of an airport which is located within a Site of Community Importance ", such as the Regional Natural Park of Sile river?
It 'clear that if the Italian airports (for this report to the European Commission: genre, Malpensa and Canova) violate the EIA and SEA the greatest responsibility must be attributed to ENAC?
In view of the expressed here renews its request that, in respect of ENAC - National Civil Aviation - Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 - 00185 Rome, must be open for a verification procedure for infringement of Directive 85 / 337/CEE (EIA Directive) and violation of Directive 2001/42/EC (SEA Directive) on the airport development plan been submitted and / or representatives of this public body .
.
And now we wait and see what happens.
1 Valerio Catullo Airport of Verona - experiment only the scoping process - still no way
Airport Civil Aviation Authority in two documents sent Catullo Airport (but also also sent to the European Commission) writes: "It 's clear that during the course of proceedings in the above company Valerio Catullo Airport will not lead to interventions that have lead to increases in capacitance of the traffic. "
no way in the last six months the airport of Verona flights and routes has increased by 30% and is doing work to strengthen the runway to increase the flying range of aircraft and intercontinental routes with the Environmental Impact Study is not yet been sent to the Ministry of the Environment to initiate the EIA process
2_ Milan Malpensa Airport - Decree of Environmental Compatibility NEGATIVE - still no way
Airport Civil Aviation Authority - as indicated in the documents already submitted to the European Commission - is approving the Pro-gram contract between SEA SpA and ENAC which stipulates the construction of a third runway at Malpensa, as well as a number of other enhancements flight infrastructure, but the advance there is no trace. Posts to Malpensa Airport
infrastructure that not only allow an increase in airport charges, which are the work - to alert the Civil Aviation Authority - SEA - should be ready for EXPO 2015 to be held in just four years.
3_ Antonio Canova Airport of Treviso - Decree of Environmental Compatibility NEGATIVE - No Way
Airport Treviso Airport despite the negative opinion of The Regional Natural Park del Fiume Sile è passato da 200.000 a 2.000.000 di passeggeri nonostante avesse ottenuto un Decreto di Compatibilità Ambientale NEGATIVO.
In questi ultimi 10/12 anni, un aeroporto che è stato realizzato all’interno di un’area S.I.C. e quindi all’interno di un Sito di Interesse Comunitario, non ha mai ottenuto un parere positivo di Compatibilità Ambientale e oggi, vi è in atto un tentativo di violazione della Direttiva V.I.A. autorizzando altri lavori e altri potenziamenti.
Il ruolo di controllo e di responsabilità di E.N.A.C. sulla mancanza di V.I.A. degli Aeroporti.
Perché E.N.A.C. che sarebbe un Ente Pubblico che dovrebbe controllare gli aeroporti, perchè prima di approvare degli incrementi Capacitive traffic (eg the airport of Verona), does not verify if these airport facilities are in possession of appropriate decree of Environmental Compatibility? ENAC
Why would a public body should oversee the airports, because before approving the program contracts with the airport management company (for example, Malpensa Airport), airport infrastructure does not verify whether these are in possession of adequate Decree of Environmental Compatibility? ENAC
Why would a public body should oversee the airports, because before approving the expansion and upgrading of airport systems, (eg the airport Treviso) airport infrastructure does not verify whether these are in possession of appropriate decree of Environmental Compatibility? How can
ENAC - but also the city of Treviso - have allowed the Treviso airport could expand and strengthen within a SIC which is the Regional Natural Park of the Sile River? And how can
ENAC shall assume that the third runway at Malpensa has to be designed to be implemented within the Natural Park of the Ticino River? How can
ENAC can afford to upgrade and expand the airport of Verona, with 100% of the scheduled departure of the city of Verona and an area already heavily polluted highways, ring roads and Dial Europe? If
ENAC - National Civil Aviation Authority is the subject controller which should control the airport management company, because then ENAC also becomes the proponent that has different procedures for EIA (Screening - scoping - SIA - VIA), thus becoming at once: Controller well controlled? Why
ENAC BEFORE approving the projects of development of infrastructure of the airport of Treviso (those that are already in the tendering procedure without an EIA) and then asks the screening procedure? ENAC
Why is so convinced to obtain a positive opinion to the exclusion of the EIA of an airport which is located within a Site of Community Importance ", such as the Regional Natural Park of Sile river?
It 'clear that if the Italian airports (for this report to the European Commission: genre, Malpensa and Canova) violate the EIA and SEA the greatest responsibility must be attributed to ENAC?
In view of the expressed here renews its request that, in respect of ENAC - National Civil Aviation - Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 - 00185 Rome, must be open for a verification procedure for infringement of Directive 85 / 337/CEE (EIA Directive) and violation of Directive 2001/42/EC (SEA Directive) on the airport development plan been submitted and / or representatives of this public body .
.
And now we wait and see what happens.
0 comments:
Post a Comment